Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1137020080190040251
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
2008 Volume.19 No. 4 p.251 ~ p.255
Comparison between L and E gene amplification analytical methods for human papillomavirus typing
Cho Hong-Bum

Kim Kyung-Tai
Kim Young-Jae
Abstract
Objective: L and E6/E7 gene amplification analyses were compared to ide

Methods: L1 gene verified HPV typing was accomplished via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and membrane assays. Verification of HPV typing via E6/E7 genes was accomplished through nested multiplexed PCR. The results from 104 samples were compared.

Results: The rates of accordance and difference were 35% and 65%, respectively. For 29% of the analyses, nested multiplexed PCR was more diversified than the membrane assay.

Conclusion: HPV can be classified into low-risk HPV and high-risk HPV groups. In parallel amplifications of the L and E genes is more efficient for accurate diagnosis in light of the different symptoms and attendant precautions of the risk groups.
KEYWORD
Human papillomavirus, L1 gene, E6/E7 gene
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø